|
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
JIM GIBBONS
GOVERNOR
CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO
ATTORNEY GENERAL
ROSS MILLER
SECRETARY OF STATE
|
STATE OF NEVADA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Offender Management Division
P.O. Box 7011
Carson City, NV 89702
(775) 887-3216
Fax: (775) 887-3253
|
HOWARD SKOLNIK
DIRECTOR
|
MEMORANDUM
|
To:
|
Departmental Staff
|
|
From:
|
Rex Reed, Administrator
Offender Management Division
|
|
Subj:
|
Sentence Management
|
|
Date:
|
January 3, 2008
|
Issue: Inmates,
families, and friends have questioned the computation of projected
parole and discharge dates.
Response: Those with an
interest in parole and discharge dates sometimes do not understand
how an inmate's actions can change his projected expiration date
and actual discharge date. A short explanation follows:
Explanation of
Projections used in Sentence Computations
A projected expiration date
is a conditional date. Inmates earning good time, work, and
meritorious credits constantly move their actual discharge dates.
Given that the actual discharge date is unknown for most of an
inmate's prison term, the department provides inmates with a
service that estimates a discharge date. That estimate calculated by
the department's computer should be considered a guide, maybe even
fictional, until the computer locks in an actual date approximately
seven to ten days before release.
Departmental computers
provide inmates with estimated parole eligibility and expiration
dates by assuming an inmate earns the maximum amount of flat,
statutory good time, and work credits. Unfortunately, many inmates
do not earn the maximum amount of days. Days are also referred to as
credits. Work, flat, and statutory good time credits are posted once
a month. If an inmate does not earn the maximum number of credits,
the computer changes the estimated release date at the time of
posting.
Assume the computer system
estimates the sentence expiration of a medium custody inmate from the
first of the year and with one year left on a sentence. At a
maximum, such an inmate earns approximately 30 days of flat time, 10
days of work credit, and 20 days of statutory good time. (Note:
Different custodies and sentences can earn at different rates.) That
totals 60 credits per month or 2 credits for every day served. The
computer does not estimate meritorious credits. Therefore, staff
have programmed the computer to assume the inmate earns approximately
60 days of credit each month. Assume the inmate has one year left on
his sentence. Therefore, the inmate can earn the 365 days needed to
expire his sentence in slightly over six and not twelve months. The
computer estimates the inmate will finish his sentence on July 3.
Using the same assumptions
listed above, the computer can estimate a new projected or fictional
expiration date should the inmate earn meritorious credits, such as
120 credits for an associate of arts degree. When the graduation
paperwork is filed with the department, staff post, and the inmate
receives, all 120 credits. Because the computer is programmed to
assume the inmate is earning approximately 60 days of total credits
for each month served, the computer will credit the inmate's
sentence all 120 days and move the projected release up two months.
The computer calculates the inmate's new fictional expiration date
to be shortened by only 60 days because the inmate earns two days of
credit for every actual day he serves. His projected release date
will move from July 3 to May 3.
The opposite effect is found
in computer calculations when an inmate forfeits statutory good time.
Assume an inmate forfeits 120 days of statutory good time for
destroying state property. Assuming the inmate continues to earn two
days each day served, he can earn the 120 days of credit he forfeited
in only 60 days. His new projected expiration date will lengthen his
actual prison stay just 60 days and not 120, that is from May 3 back
to July 3.
Staff and inmates should
always remember that fictional expiration and parole dates are
constantly moving estimates trying to reflect what will be the actual
release date, which is also constantly moving based upon an inmate's
number of flat plus earned work, statutory good time, and meritorious
credits and less forfeited statutory good time. Because the
computer system uses fixed assumptions while inmates earn credits in
a fluctuating fashion, estimated date movements cannot be calculated
by simply adding or subtracting credit awards or forfeitures in a
one-for-one fashion.
People interested in how
release dates move will find the table listed below helpful. The
table shows that when an inmate receives a meritorious award the old
estimated sentence structure includes months that the inmate will no
longer serve. Therefore, most of the credits in May and all of those
in June and July that were credited to the inmate are no longer
available to the inmate. The approximately 60 credits the inmate
will not earn in May, June, and July have to be made up by the
120-day award before the new estimated release date can move forward.
120 days minus 60 days is 60 days. Therefore, the new estimated
date will move up approximately 60 days from July 3 to May 3.
Although the new estimated release date moves only 60 days forward,
the computer gives the inmate his full 120 days of credit for the
meritorious award. A similar but opposite movement occurs when the
inmate loses 120 credits due to a disciplinary. The actual release
date moves back two and not four months.
|
This table graphically represents how the
department's computer software would estimate a medium custody
inmate's sentence expiration with one merit award of 120 days and
one disciplinary forfeiture of 120 days if the inmate has 365 days
remaining on his sentence as of January 1.
|
|
Inmate time if no merit or stat forfeitures
|
Inmate time if one merit award and one stat
forfeiture
|
|
Month
|
Flat Time
|
Work Earned
|
Statutory Good Time Earned
|
Total Sentence Credits
|
Days Remaining in Sentence
|
Merit Award
|
Days Remaining in Sentence
|
Disciplinary Forfeiture
|
Days Remaining in Sentence
|
|
Jan
|
31
|
10
|
20
|
61
|
304
|
|
304
|
|
304
|
|
Feb
|
28
|
10
|
20
|
58
|
246
|
|
246
|
|
246
|
|
Mar
|
31
|
10
|
20
|
61
|
185
|
120
|
65
|
|
65
|
|
Apr
|
30
|
10
|
20
|
60
|
125
|
|
5
|
-120
|
125
|
|
May
|
31
|
10
|
20
|
61
|
64
|
|
Note #1
|
|
64
|
|
Jun
|
30
|
10
|
20
|
60
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Jul
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
4
|
Note #2
|
|
|
|
Note #2
|
|
Totals
|
183
|
61
|
121
|
365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note #1: As the inmate in this scenario has five
days left at the end of April, he will discharge May 3rd with
three days of flat time, one day of stat time, and one day of work
time.
|
|
Note #2: As the inmates in this scenario has four
days left at the end of June, he will discharge July 3rd with two
days of flat time, one day of stat time, and one day of work time.
|
The above is a simple
description of the process used to estimate an inmate's parole
eligibility and discharge dates. As an inmate approaches parole
eligibility and discharge, sentence structures are carefully reviewed
to account for any factors other than what are listed in this short
explanation.
What determines when an
inmate is released from prison?
An inmate is released from
prison when he completes his sentence. If an inmate is sentenced on
January 1, 2009 to 600 days (20 months), then he will be released
from prison on September 1, 2010. If, however, the inmate takes
advantage of the statutory good-time credits, work and study credits,
and meritorious credits the law offers, he can cut his sentence from
20 months to 10 months or less.
What is a projected
expiration date?
When an inmate begins his
sentence, NDOC projects or computes in advance how many days the
inmate needs to serve in order to discharge or complete his sentence.
Staff have programmed the computer to estimate the projected
expiration date based upon the assumption that the inmate will earn
the maximum good time credits and work time credits available while
he is in prison. One credit equals one day. For example, if an
inmate begins a 600-day (20 months) sentence on January 1, 2009, then
NDOC projects that during each month in prison, the inmate will earn
30 days flat time, 20 days good time, and 10 days work time, for a
total of 60 days per month. So, NDOC projects that the inmate will
complete his 600-day (20 month) sentence in 10 months (60 days credit
x 10 months = 600 days) and gives him a projected expiration date of
November 1, 2009. A simpler way to compute the projected expiration
date is to divide the sentence by two. In other words, NDOC projects
that if, and only if, an inmate works or studies and abides by prison
rules, he can cut his sentence in half. Unfortunately, most inmates
do not take advantage of the maximum good time credits and work
credits available.
How does the inmate's
conduct change the projected expiration date?
Inmates often misunderstand
that the projected expiration date is conditioned upon the inmate's
earning 20 days good time credit and 10 days work time credit every
month he is in prison. If he does not earn the projected good-time
credits or work time credits, then his projected expiration date will
change or move back. If, for example, the inmate does not work while
he is in prison, he only earns 50 days each month (30 days flat time
plus 20 days good time) instead of 60 days each month towards the
completion of his sentence. This means it will take him 12 months to
complete his 600-day (20 month) sentence (30 days flat plus 20 days
good time credit x 12 months = 600 days). So the inmate's not
working causes him to spend 2 more months in prison than he would
have if he had worked, and results in a negative change to his
projected expiration date from November 1, 2009 to January 1, 2010.
The inmate's violation of
prison rules can also change his projected expiration date. An
inmate can earn 20 days of good time credit each month if he stays
out of trouble. Violation of prison rules can result in the loss of
some or all of the good time credits that the inmate has accumulated.
For example, if an inmate has the above projected expiration date of
November 1, 2009, and he loses 120 days of good time credit, this
results in a negative change to his projected expiration date from
November 1, 2009 to January 1, 2010.
On the other hand, if an
inmate earns meritorious or educational credit, or works in a
conservation camp, he can positively change his projected expiration
date and shorten his sentence. The projected expiration date does
not take into consideration in advance that an inmate will earn
meritorious or educational credit, so when an inmate earns
meritorious or educational credit, he shortens his sentence. If, for
example, an inmate takes classes and earns 120 credits, then he takes
120 days off his sentence. It is extremely important to understand
that this 120 days is not subtracted from his projected expiration
date, but is subtracted from the length of his original sentence. By
earning the 120 days meritorious credit, the sentence is shortened
from 600 days to 480 days. NDOC then re-computes his projected
expiration date by projecting how long it will take the inmate to
serve his 480 days (assuming or projecting that the inmate will earn
all the maximum good time credits and work time credits possible)
which positively changes or moves up his projected expiration date.
Why does an inmate's
projected expiration date stay the same when he has earned the
maximum amount of available work time credits and good time credits?
The projected expiration
date stays the same because the date already includes the maximum
available good time and work time credits. As long as, and only as
long as, the inmate earns 60 days per month (30 days flat time plus
20 days good time plus 10 days work time), he can serve his 600-day
sentence in 300 days.
How often does NDOC compute the projected expiration date?
NDOC re-computes an inmate's
Projected Expiration Date at the beginning of each month. If the
inmate during the previous month earns less than 10 days work time
credits or he forfeits good time credits, his projected expiration
date negatively changes and his release date moves further out. If
he earns 20 days good time and 10 days work time, then his projected
expiration date stays the same. If he earns meritorious credit, then
his projected expiration date can move up.
Why did NDOC only move up
an inmate's projected expiration date sixty days if he earned 120
days for getting an associate's degree? Isn't the NDOC program
only giving the inmate credit for half the days he earned and robbing
him of 60 days?
The answer is clearly no.
You cannot subtract the 120 days from the projected expiration date.
You have to subtract the 120 days from the length of the original
sentence. For example, let us suppose an inmate is sentenced on
January 1, 2009 to 600 days. NDOC correctly sets his projected
expiration date at November 1, 2009 (300 days away). Let us further
suppose that this inmate, on July 1, 2009 (after he has served 180
days) earns an associate's degree which entitles him to 120 days
meritorious credits. Most inmates then mistakenly think that they
should be released immediately because as of July 1, 2009 their
projected expiration date was 120 days away and they earned 120
meritorious credits through the associate's degree. When NDOC
gives the inmate the 120 day meritorious credit, re-computes the
projected expiration date and tells the inmate his new projected
expiration date is not immediately but 60 days away on September 1,
2009, the inmates then mistakenly believe NDOC is only giving them 60
days credit instead of 120. The fact that you can't subtract the
120 days meritorious credit from the remaining 120 projected days is
borne out by the fact that you can't discharge a 600 day sentence
if you only serve 180 days and are given a 120 day credit, shown as
follows:
|
|
Flat time
|
|
|
Good time
|
|
Work time
|
|
Total
|
|
|
120 days
|
credit (Assoc.)
|
|
|
|
=
|
120 days
|
|
plus
|
180 days
|
served
|
+
|
120 days
|
+
|
60 days
|
=
|
360 days
|
|
|
300 days
|
|
+
|
120 days
|
+
|
60 days
|
=
|
480 days
|
So, even with a 120 day
credit, an inmate who serves 180 days cannot earn enough flat-time,
good time and work time to complete a 600 day sentence. One cannot
subtract the 120 meritorious days from the remaining 120 projected
days and conclude a sentence should be discharged. Estimating a new
sentence date does not work that way.
If, however, you subtract
the 120 meritorious credits from the original 600 day sentence, this
leaves a 480 day sentence. To project a new expiration date, one can
divide the 480 days by 2 to arrive at the correct projected
expiration date of 240 days. This calculation is borne out by the
following:
|
|
Flat time
|
|
|
Good time
|
|
Work time
|
|
Total
|
|
|
120 days
|
credit (Assoc.)
|
|
|
|
=
|
120 days
|
|
plus
|
240 days
|
served
|
+
|
160 days
|
+
|
80 days
|
=
|
480 days
|
|
|
360 days
|
|
+
|
160 days
|
+
|
80 days
|
=
|
600 days
|
Thus, in order to expire a
600 day sentence, after getting a credit of 120 days for earning an
associate's degree, an inmate has to serve 240 days to reach the
480 days necessary to expire a 600 day sentence. This calculation
again assumes that the inmate earns the maximum good-time credits and
maximum work-time credits during the 240 days he serves. Because the
inmate had served 180 days when he received the associate's degree,
he has to serve another 60 days before he can complete his sentence,
so his projected expiration date is recomputed to 60 days away on
September 1, 2009. It is understandable why some inmates believe
they are getting only half of the credits they earned, but
nonetheless, their belief is incorrect.
|